Saturday, May 18, 2019

Organ Donation Essay

Many citizens invariably see television specifys and media that negatively portray electronic organ gift. single height example comes from the new hit series, speck Tuck. Nip Tuck has a storyline built somewhat this image of beauty finished plastic surgery while working with an underground kidney market. Many long-suffering roles in this show wind up being murdered in some cruel intentional manner just for a single kidney. Not scarce does this pull negativity to organ displaces already hardly someone watching also has to fear the person in occupy of that organ. Majority of the time Nip Tuck has wealthy, well connected businessmen who need the transplants.Symbolizing any type of authority mannikin with the power to film a life lav begin to inflict a slight number of oppression through the viewers mind. With reed organ largess becoming thrown into this light constantly pack forgeting to give donated organs to citizens of need has drastic tell apartlyy begun to d ecrease. More Americans argon becoming obsess with living lifelong and experiencing more, ignoring the basic side effects of their actions and soon needing some configuration of organ donated. This step-up in exploration has created a large demand for many of these operations, shoes that simply can non be filled. Organ boon serves three main positive purposes, Scientific Studies, Medical transplants, and Hope.While many might not know a multi-organ procedure is thinkable many of the same failures an single(a) could have in their vegetable marrow, could be linked to the trouble in their kidneys and surprisingly the procedure is relatively common. With a single organ donation there is always the risk of the idiosyncratics frames rejection of this new article. Now if we premise two different organs in one operation, the odds Allee 2of a personate rejecting at least one of the organs grow drastically. This adds multiple different stresses on the body not provided because o f the two separate procedures nevertheless as well as on the inside as the body tries to become familiarwith these new tools. Studies show that clinical data on all episodes of treated rejection from a multi-organ transplant out of 56 patients 48% of these patients have had no rejection in either organ, 27% go through heart rejection alone, 14% experienced kidney rejection alone, and 11% had both heart and kidney allograft rejection( pg. 861-867).Of course there are other factors that play into these tests such as age or condition of other organs solely the main outlier in this register was actually the severity of any surgery. Many would look at these percentages in the study as a negative outcome. What wasnt stated earlier about this experiment was that all 48% of the successful transplants were heart and kidney transplants. The other 52% that had trouble with the new organs were simply because of the quarantined heart transplant procedure. This procedure allows for scarce to no mistakes throughout the entire process because of the preciseness.The argument is wherefore discredited because of the relationships with many other surgeries because of the high risk factors. Technological advances are constantly erupting in the medical field from surgery techniques to the basic procedures and listed instructions being taught to the successors of the current medical staffs. The process of organ donation is only increasing in effectiveness and soon will become a large attention in the economic jungle, as of now organ donation may still be a recalled toy in some cases but the kinks are all becoming smooth and positively functional. everlastingly refuted is the health and disease control of most transplant procedures which can contain a plethora of viruses. Facts show that a patient receiving a solid organ transplant was 10 times more apparent to become infected with cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease 15 years ago. New advancements and studies have designed an antivi rus word that is over 95% successful at containing and illuminating CMV within six to twelve months. The patient will receive doses of antiviral prophylaxis either orally or by injection consistently for several(prenominal) months. As the patient shows progress and recovery the dosage is steadily decreased until the body becomes completely self-sufficient. move the disease concern to rest another opposition of organ transplants can come in the form of broken or fractured bones.When an individualreceives a transplant the bone structure around the area can become under pressure from the swelling organ trying to recover. A study was conducted in 1994 and scientists were shock to find fracture incidence was 13 times higher than expected in manlike heart recipients age 4564 years nearly 5 times higher in male kidney recipients age 2544 and age 4564 years and 18 times and 34 times higher in female kidney recipients age 2544 years and 4564 years compared with NHIS data ( division of Med icine, 1999). The study was taken from six hundred patients and out of those six hundred litre six individuals had fractures during their recoveries. Another aspect in the recovery process is the fact that the patients body will be weak and low on nutrients due to the lack of food intake and nutrients.The longer a persons recovery period the more likely he or she could father weak muscle tissue, and bone structure leading to more incidents. The care programs developed in this day and age not only surpass any rehabilitation abilities from 1994. Now treatment not only includes multiple vitamin and nutritional supplements but also multiple electrostatic treatments specifically designed to work an individuals muscle structure. This will provide motion and a large supply of blood flowing to the area or muscle needing the extra work. As the muscle structure improves a patients bone structure becomes stabilized and reinforced leaving the entire patients system in close to complete health .Organ donation has also been studied from multiple perspectives of the patient and donor. Scientists first wondered the thought process an individual went through to part with his or her organ.One would expect that a person about to go through this procedure would look for some knowledge or look for before relinquishing their organ. A study institute that not only did the majority of organ donors not have any factual culture about their procedure from previous classes or events but the donors also had done absolutely no research on the topic. This showed the scientists that there was no apparent cognitive thought process for committing this act. Most of the studied donors discovered a sense of satisfaction afterward the procedure simply from the knowledge that they could have possibly rescue a life. Another angle taken by scientists was moredirect towards the patient receiving the organ. UNOS is a private, nonprofit organization that coordinates the nations organ transplant system under contract with the federal government.In the year 2000, more than 5,500 Americans died awaiting transplants, and in the U.S., there are currently over 80,000 people awaiting transplants. Having abundance in patients waiting for an organ and the shortage in supply majority of the organs received are from people who have passed away and donated their bodies to apprehension. Although a donor can survive his or her life even after giving up a Kidney, portions of the liver, skin & bone marrow few individuals are willing to take this risk only increasing this shortage. Every 10 minutes, a new person is added to the organ transplant waiting list. When a patient receives an organ the family gains an immediate boost of moral and hope. The placebo affect organizes in honorable force when it comes to surgery. Knowledge alone can give the patient enough to fight and continue the up(a) rise to recovery.Ninety percent of Americans have openly stated that they are for organ donation . Life kinds are difficult to make. Organ transplantation includes plenty of these changes in order for recovery and success. In the end change is for the better. Organ transplantation calls for a healthier diet and slowly working into exercise practices. Any patient will gain from this in the process and the new organ or area from the surgery will not be the only part of their body positively affected by this change. Organ donation is a obligatory medical implement and there will always be a need as long as the technology keeps its firm grasp on the medical society. If the organization UNOS does not remain in supply and continue helping save lives many more lives will be lost. Not from loss in supply of the organs but more so from underground procedures.One example of this is constantly seen in Mexico. There was a woman who had needed some cash so she decided to donate a kidney. This individual was told no passport or information would be necessary and that she would simply take a bus to a small Mexican border town thus be brought back. Border patrol intercepted a woman being forcibly taken across the border, found in the vehicle was a complete surgical kit, asingle shovel, and a large toss bag. Not only would this individual have never seen another day of life and laughter but this would just be the beginning if organ donation ceased to exist. Eliminating these organ transplant foundations would introduce patients to multiple diseases, possible contamination, and worst of all death from incorrect practice. All of the information only points to a positive give in for organ transplants. As long as citizens see the dire need for support and donors, soon organ transplantation will have a successful future, full of keeping both hopes and dreams alive.Works CitedAbecassis M, Adams M, Adams P, et al. Consensus description on the live organ donor. JAMA 20002842919-2926Bredehorn T. et al. (2002), Questioning the relatives for organ and tissue donation, transpla nting proceedings 34(6)2353-4.DiSalvo, Thomas. Clinical Transplantation Williams & Wilkins 1997, 27 March Volume 63 Issue 6 pg. 861-867,Ed Lovern, HHS launches bid for organ donations, in advance(p) Healthcare, 23 April 2001, 21. Lock M., Schmidt V.-H. (2003), Twice dead organ transplant and the reinvention of death, Asian journal of social science (31)1137-41.Organ Procurement and Transplant Network (OPTN) National Waiting List, as of 2 August 2002. for sale http//www.unos.org/frame_Default.asp?Category=Newsdata. Accessed 8 August 2002. Reprints or correspondence Dr. Carlos V. Paya, Div. of Infectious Diseases, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905 (payamayo.edu)U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Organ Donation Donate Life, Frequently Asked Questions. Available at http//www.organdonor.gov/faq.html. Accessed 08/08/2002.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.